Skip to main content

Investment · FINANCIAL TOOLS

SIP vs Lumpsum Calculator

Compare investing an amount all at once against spreading it over monthly instalments, on equal terms.

Understand the calculation

Calculation logic, formula, example and guardrails behind the estimate.

How it works

The calculator projects the same total amount two ways. The lump sum route invests everything on day one and compounds for the whole period. The instalment route divides the amount into equal monthly payments, and whatever those instalments have built keeps compounding for the rest of the period.

Both routes are held to the same effective annual return. That sounds obvious but it is the part most comparisons get wrong: the underlying SIP and lumpsum engines use different compounding conventions, so giving both the same nominal percentage would hand the monthly route a 0.68 percentage point advantage that has nothing to do with strategy. The equalised nominal rate is shown as an output so you can see the adjustment being made.

More detail

Money not yet invested is treated as earning nothing. If you would in practice park it in a liquid fund while it waits, the STP calculator models that case, which is the more realistic version of staggering.

The result under a constant return will always favour the lump sum, for a reason that has nothing to do with markets: a rupee invested earlier earns for longer. The scenarios are there to show how the size of that gap responds to the window, the rate and the horizon.

If the money would earn something in a liquid fund while it waits, the STP calculator models that.

For a plain monthly investment out of income rather than a lump sum, use the SIP calculator.

Formula

Lump: A(1 + r)^n · Instalments: SIP(A ÷ m, iₑ, m months) compounded for the remainder

No formula is defined here. Both sides call the same engines as the standalone calculators; iₑ is the nominal monthly rate equivalent to the effective annual rate r, namely 12 × ((1 + r)^(1/12) − 1).

A
The total amount, identical on both routes.
r
Effective annual return — what one year actually earns.
n
Investment period in years.
m
Number of monthly instalments.
iₑ
The nominal annual rate that compounds monthly to exactly r, so neither route is favoured by convention.
Worked example

₹12,00,000 invested over 10 years at an assumed 12% effective annual return, either at once or across 12 monthly instalments of ₹1,00,000.

  1. 01Lump sum₹12,00,000 × 1.12¹⁰ = ₹37,27,018
  2. 02Equalised nominal rate for the monthly route12 × (1.12^(1/12) − 1) = 11.3866%
  3. 03Why not simply 12%12% nominal monthly earns 12.6825% a year — an unfair edge
  4. 04Instalments over 12 months, then 9 more years of growthProjected below the lump sum

The lump sum ends ahead because its money was invested for longer at the same rate. Change the assumed return to 0% and the two routes land on exactly the same figure, which confirms the gap is entirely a function of time invested rather than of anything about either strategy.

Frequently asked questions

Common questions about the sip vs lumpsum calculator and the assumptions behind it.

Disclaimer

This calculator is provided for general information and planning only. It is not investment, tax or legal advice, and it does not take your personal circumstances into account. Outputs are estimates based on the assumptions stated on this page, exclude taxes and charges unless said otherwise, and market-linked returns are not guaranteed — the value of investments can fall as well as rise. Lending terms, rates and eligibility are decided by the lender. For advice on your own situation, speak to a qualified professional, several of whom you can consult on Finvestalk.